<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unmarried Blog &#187; singlism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unmarried.org/blog/category/singlism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unmarried.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:07:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Marital status, race and ethnicity</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/02/16/marital-status-race-and-ethnicity/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/02/16/marital-status-race-and-ethnicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really glad to see the impact of marital status discrimination addressed in Race Talk.  With 70% of African-American adults unmarried (compared to 45% of Whites and 49% of Latinos in the US), every law or economic policy that uses marital status has a disparate impact on the Black community.  AtMP agrees wholeheartedly that
it’s time to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/02/16/marital-status-race-and-ethnicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India&#8217;s single women resist stigma, demand rights</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/01/10/indias-single-women-resist-stigma-demand-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/01/10/indias-single-women-resist-stigma-demand-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A must-read article from Women&#8217;s ENews!  quick highlights:
Formerly-married women in India outnumber the entire population of Canada.  Ever-single women haven&#8217;t even been counted.  But 58,000 women belong to single women&#8217;s organizations in 8 of India&#8217;s federated states.  These organizations have lobbied for economic support, equal pay, and the right not to be burned as witches.
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2010/01/10/indias-single-women-resist-stigma-demand-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matrimania at Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/21/matrimania-at-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/21/matrimania-at-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What a rude surprise I got this morning!  Upon signing in to manage one of AtMP&#8217;s Yahoo groups, I was instructed to create new secret questions. Yahoo helpfully suggests lots of question possibilities.  But strikingly, four of their top five suggestions assume I am married!
Thanks to Bella DePaulo for coining the wonderful word &#8220;matrimania&#8221; so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/21/matrimania-at-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;What&#8217;s next, marrying your dog?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/18/whats-next-marrying-your-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/18/whats-next-marrying-your-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their lonely-hearts faces peer out of the advertisements, hangdog and looking for love. &#8230;In matrimony-mad India, where marriage is the central event of a lifetime, these posters could easily be for lovelorn, small-town bachelors, pasted up by anxious parents seeking a bride.   But the suitable girl these single fellows seek is of the furry, four-footed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/08/18/whats-next-marrying-your-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy senior singles</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/15/happy-senior-singles/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/15/happy-senior-singles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s good myth-busting going on at the New Old Age blog.  Recent posts debunk the singlist notion that being unmarried in old age means being unhappy and alone.
From a research study mentioned in the blog:
Are Older Adults Happy? They&#8217;re about as happy as everyone else. And perhaps more importantly, the same factors that predict happiness [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/15/happy-senior-singles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachelors&#8217; independence, not equality</title>
		<link>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/04/bachelors-independence-not-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/04/bachelors-independence-not-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[singlism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unmarried.org/blog/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York Times op-ed by John Gilbert McCurdy celebrates the Fourth of July as the
dawn of a new era when personal differences — first marital status, but later sex and race — no longer mattered in determining one’s citizenship.
Well, unmarried citizenship is not in question; but equal treatment is still far off.  Has the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://unmarried.org/blog/2009/07/04/bachelors-independence-not-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
